New article uploaded

John H. Ely's Formulation of "Representation- Reinforcement" As An Approach For Constitutional Interpretation

dc.contributor.authorAnjali Rawat
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T08:10:34Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractEly’s approach has had a fair amount of influence on the Supreme Court’s approach to constitutional interpretation since the 1990s. Boynton argues that Ely and the Court’s approach resembles in many areas.48 The Court has not completely adopted Ely’s approach but it is leaning towards it, in its reading of privileges and immunities clause for instance.49 Ely’s approach also serves to explain the Warren Court’s decisions but he did not agree with all of Warren Court decisions.50 No one theory can fully explain the decision making of the Court in a comprehensive manner. Insofar as Ely’s theory has given us a limited justification of judicial review in tandem with democratic ideals of the American polity, it has made its mark.
dc.identifier.citationNLUJ Law Review 1 (2014)
dc.identifier.issn2326-5320
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.191.209.183:4000/handle/123456789/89
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNLUJ Law Review; Vol 2 Issue 2
dc.subjectLAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Public law::Constitutional law
dc.subjectDemocracy
dc.titleJohn H. Ely's Formulation of "Representation- Reinforcement" As An Approach For Constitutional Interpretation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JOHN H. ELY’S FORMULATION OF.pdf
Size:
164.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: